The 80,000 Hours Podcast features unusually in-depth conversations about the world’s most pressing problems and how you can use your career to solve them.
We invite guests pursuing a wide range of career paths – from academics and activists to entrepreneurs and policymakers — to analyse the case for and against working on different issues and figure out which approaches are best for solving them.
The show is produced and edited by Keiran Harris. Get in touch with feedback or guest suggestions by emailing [email protected]
How to listen
Search for “80,000 Hours” wherever you get podcasts, or click one of the buttons below:
You’ll find transcripts and links to further reading on the episode pages.
“The podcast has substantially changed how I think about the entire world, how I donate money, and has made me open to exploring job opportunities that would do more good for the world.”
— Steven Bills
What is 80,000 Hours?
80,000 Hours is a non-profit dedicated to helping people have a larger positive influence on the world with their careers. If you’re new here, read our “Key ideas” series to get our current take on how to think about careers that have a positive impact and where the best opportunities may lie.
Robert Wiblin is one of the interviewers I most respect, and indeed, envy. He is Director of Research at a nonprofit called 80,000 Hours, and their mission is to figure out and then communicate to people how they can do the most good with their careers.
Robert is a long-standing leader in the effective altruism movement. He runs an excellent podcast called the 80,000 Hours Podcast. And he is from Adelaide.
— Tyler Cowen
Rob studied genetics and economics at the Australian National University, graduating top of his class and later being named Young Alumnus of the Year. He worked as a research economist in various Australian Government agencies, before joining the Centre for Effective Altruism in Oxford, first as Research Director and then Executive Director. In 2015 he joined 80,000 Hours as Head of Research.
A serious reasoning error that is particularly common among educated people is to argue that if a study hasn't been done on a particular question we have 'no data', and therefore no basis on which to form beliefs or act.